LTC1704/LTC1704B
16
1704bfa
APPLICATIO S I FOR ATIO
WUU
U
Maximizing High Load Current Efficiency
Efficiency at high load currents is primarily controlled by
the resistance of the components in the power path (QT,
QB, L) and power lost in the gate drive circuits due to
MOSFET gate charge. Maximizing efficiency in this region
of operation is as simple as minimizing these terms.
The behavior of the load over time affects the efficiency
strategy. Parasitic resistances in the MOSFETs and the
inductor set the maximum output current the circuit can
supply without burning up. A typical efficiency curve
shows that peak efficiency occurs near 30% of this maxi-
mum current. If the load current will vary around the
efficiency peak and spend relatively little time at the
maximum load, choosing components so that the average
load is at the efficiency peak is a good idea. This puts the
maximum load well beyond the efficiency peak, but usu-
ally gives the greatest system efficiency over time, which
translates to the longest run time in a battery-powered
system. If the load is expected to be relatively constant at
the maximum level, the components should be chosen so
that this load lands at the peak efficiency point, well below
the maximum possible output of the converter.
Maximizing Low Load Current Efficiency
Low load current efficiency depends strongly on proper
operation in Burst Mode operation. In an ideally optimized
system, when Burst Mode operation is activated, gate
drive is the dominant loss term. Burst Mode operation
turns off all output switching for several clock cycles in a
row, significantly cutting gate drive losses. As the load
current in Burst Mode operation falls toward zero, the
current drawn by the circuit falls to the LTC1704’s back-
ground quiescent level, about 4.5mA.
To maximize low load efficiency, make sure the LTC1704
(non-B part) is allowed to enter Burst Mode operation as
cleanly as possible. Minimize ringing at the SW node so
that the Burst comparator leaves as little residual current
in the inductor as possible when QB turns off. It helps to
connect the SW pin of the LTC1704 as close to the drain
of QB as possible. An RC snubber network can also be
added from SW to PGND.
SWITCHER SUPPLY EXTERNAL
COMPONENT SELECTION
Power MOSFETs Selection
Getting peak efficiency out of the LTC1704 switcher sup-
ply depends strongly on the external MOSFETs used. The
LTC1704 requires at least two external MOSFETs—more
if one or more of the MOSFETs are paralleled to lower on-
resistance. To work efficiently, these MOSFETs must
exhibit low R
DS(ON)
at 5V V
GS
to minimize resistive power
loss while they are conducting current. They must also
have low gate charge to minimize transition losses during
switching. On the other hand, voltage breakdown require-
ments in a typical LTC1704 circuit are pretty tame; the 6V
maximum input voltage limits the V
DS
and V
GS
the MOSFETs
can see to safe levels for most devices.
Low R
DS(ON)
R
DS(ON)
calculations are pretty straightforward. R
DS(ON)
is
the resistance from the drain to the source of the MOSFET
when the gate is fully on. Many MOSFETs have R
DS(ON)
specified at 4.5V gate drive—this is the right number to
use in LTC1704 circuits running from a 5V supply. As
current flows through this resistance while the MOSFET is
on, it generates I
2
R watts of heat, where I is the current
flowing (usually equal to the output current) and R is the
MOSFET R
DS(ON)
. This heat is only generated when the
MOSFET is on. When it is off, the current is zero and the
power lost is also zero (and the other MOSFET is busy
losing power).
This lost power does two things: it subtracts from the
power available at the output, costing efficiency, and it
makes the MOSFET hotter, both bad things. The effect is
worst at maximum load when the current in the MOSFETs
and thus the power lost, are at a maximum. Lowering
R
DS(ON)
improves heavy load efficiency at the expense of
additional gate charge (usually) and more cost (usually).
Proper choice of MOSFET R
DS(ON)
becomes a trade-off
between tolerable efficiency loss, power dissipation and
cost. Note that while the lost power has a significant effect
on system efficiency, it only adds up to a watt or two in a
typical LTC1704 circuit, allowing the use of small, surface
mount MOSFETs without heat sinks.
LTC1704/LTC1704B
17
1704bfa
APPLICATIO S I FOR ATIO
WUU
U
Gate Charge
Gate charge is amount of charge (essentially, the number
of electrons) that the LTC1704 needs to put into the gate
of an external MOSFET to turn it on. The easiest way to
visualize gate charge is to think of it as a capacitance from
the gate pin of the MOSFET to SW (for QT) or to PGND (for
QB). This capacitance is composed of MOSFET channel
charge, actual parasitic drain-source capacitance and
Miller-multiplied gate-drain capacitance, but can be ap-
proximated as a single capacitance from gate to source.
Regardless of where the charge is going, the fact remains
that it all has to come out of PV
CC
to turn the MOSFET gate
on, and when the MOSFET is turned back off, that charge
all ends up at ground. In the meanwhile, it travels through
the LTC1704’s gate drivers, heating them up. More power
lost!
In this case, the power is lost in little bite-sized chunks, one
chunk per switch per cycle, with the size of the chunk set
by the gate charge of the MOSFET. Every time the MOSFET
switches, another chunk is lost. Clearly, the faster the
clock runs, the more important gate charge becomes as a
loss term. Old fashioned switchers that ran at 20kHz could
pretty much ignore gate charge as a loss term. In the
550kHz LTC1704, gate charge loss can be a significant
efficiency penalty. Gate charge loss can be the dominant
loss term at medium load currents, especially with large
MOSFETs. Gate charge loss is also the primary cause of
power dissipation in the LTC1704 itself.
TG Charge Pump
There’s another nuance of MOSFET drive that the LTC1704
needs to get around. The LTC1704 is designed to use
N-channel MOSFETs for both QT and QB, primarily be-
cause N-channel MOSFETs generally cost less and have
lower R
DS(ON)
than similar P-channel MOSFETs. Turning
QB on is no big deal since the source of QB is attached to
PGND; the LTC1704 just switches the BG pin between
PGND and PV
CC
. Driving QT is another matter. The source
of QT is connected to SW which rises to V
IN
when QT is on.
To keep QT on, the LTC1704 must get TG one MOSFET
V
GS(ON)
above V
IN
. It does this by utilizing a floating driver
with the negative lead of the driver attached to SW (the
source of QT) and the PV
CC
lead of the driver coming out
separately at BOOST. An external 1µF capacitor (C
CP
)
connected between SW and BOOST (Figure 2) supplies
power to BOOST when SW is high, and recharges itself
through DCP when SW is low. This simple charge pump
keeps the TG driver alive even as it swings well above V
IN
.
The value of the bootstrap capacitor C
CP
needs to be at
least 100 times that of the total input capacitance of the
topside MOSFET(s). For very large external MOSFETs (or
multiple MOSFETs in parallel), C
CP
may need to be in-
creased beyond the 1µF value.
Input Supply
The BiCMOS process that allows the LTC1704 switcher
supply to include large MOSFET drivers on-chip also limits
the maximum input voltage to 6V. This limits the practical
maximum input supply to a loosely regulated 5V or 6V rail.
At the same time, the input supply needs to supply several
amps of current without excessive voltage drop. The input
supply must have regulation adequate to prevent sudden
load changes from causing the LTC1704 input voltage to
dip. In most typical applications where the LTC1704 is
generating a secondary low voltage logic supply, all of
these input conditions are met by the main system logic
supply when fortified with an input bypass capacitor.
Input Bypass Capacitor Selection
A typical LTC1704 circuit running from a 5V logic supply
might provide 1.6V at 10A at its switcher output. 5V to
1.6V implies a duty cycle of 32%, which means QT is on
32% of each switching cycle. During QT’s on-time, the
current drawn from the input equals the load current and
during the rest of the cycle, the current drawn from the
input is near zero. This 0A to 10A, 32% duty cycle pulse
train results in 4.66A
RMS
ripple current. At 550kHz, switch-
ing cycles last about 1.8µs; most system logic supplies
have no hope of regulating output current with that kind of
speed. A local input bypass capacitor is required to make
up the difference and prevent the input supply from
dropping drastically when QT kicks on. This capacitor is
usually chosen for RMS ripple current capability and ESR
as well as value.
Consider our 10A example. The input bypass capacitor
gets exercised in three ways: its ESR must be low enough
LTC1704/LTC1704B
18
1704bfa
APPLICATIO S I FOR ATIO
WUU
U
to keep the initial drop as QT turns on within reason
(100mV or so); its RMS current capability must be ad-
equate to withstand the 4.66A capacitor ripple current is
not the same as input RMS current at the input and the
capacitance must be large enough to maintain the input
voltage until the input supply can make up the difference.
Generally, a capacitor that meets the first two parameters
will have far more capacitance than is required to keep
capacitance-based droop under control. In our example,
we need 0.01 ESR to keep the input drop under 100mV
with a 10A current step and 5.65A
RMS
ripple current
capacity to avoid overheating the capacitor. These re-
quirements can be met with multiple low ESR tantalum or
electrolytic capacitors in parallel, or with a large mono-
lithic ceramic capacitor.
I
IA
IA
RMSIN
DCIN
RIPP RMS
=
=
==
565
32
565 32 466
22
.
.
(. ) (.) .
Tantalum capacitors are a popular choice as input capaci-
tors for LTC1704 applications, but they deserve a special
caution here. Generic tantalum capacitors have a destruc-
tive failure mechanism when they are subjected to large
RMS currents (like those seen at the input of an LTC1704).
At some random time after they are turned on, they can
blow up for no apparent reason. The capacitor manufac-
turers are aware of this and sell special “surge tested”
tantalum capacitors specifically designed for use with
switching regulators. When choosing a tantalum input
capacitor, make sure that it is rated to carry the RMS
current that the LTC1704 will draw. If the data sheet
doesn’t give an RMS current rating, chances are the
capacitor isn’t surge tested. Don’t use it!
Output Bypass Capacitor Selection
The output bypass capacitor has quite different require-
ments from the input capacitor. The ripple current at the
output of a buck regulator, like the LTC1704’s switcher
controller, is much lower than at the input because the
inductor current is constantly flowing at the output when-
ever the LTC1704 is operating in Continuous mode. The
primary concern at the output is capacitor ESR. Fast load
current transitions at the output will appear as voltage
across the ESR of the output bypass capacitor until the
feedback loop in the LTC1704 can change the inductor
current to match the new load current value. This ESR step
at the output is often the single largest budget item in the
load regulation calculation. As an example, our hypotheti-
cal 1.6V, 10A switcher with a 0.01 ESR output capacitor
would experience a 100mV step at the output with a 0A to
10A load step—a 6.3% output change!
Usually the solution is to parallel several capacitors at the
output. For example, to keep the transient response inside
of 3% with the previous design, we’d need an output ESR
better than 0.0048. This can be met with three 0.014,
470µF tantalum capacitors in parallel.
Inductor Selection
The inductor in a typical LTC1704 circuit is chosen prima-
rily for value and saturation current. The inductor value
sets the ripple current, which is commonly chosen at
around 40% of the anticipated full load current. Ripple
current is set by:
I
tV
L
RIPPLE
ON QB OUT
=
()
()
In our hypothetical 1.6V, 10A example, we’d set the ripple
to 40% of 10A or 4A, and the inductor value would be:
L
tV
I
sV
A
H
with t
V
V
kHz s
ON QB OUT
RIPPLE
ON QB
==
µ
=−
()
()
()
(. )(. )
.
.
/.
12 16
4
05
1
16
5
550 1 2
The inductor must not saturate at the expected peak
current. In this case, if the current limit was set to 15A, the
inductor should be rated to withstand 15A + 1/2I
RIPPLE
, or
17A without saturating.
FEEDBACK LOOP/COMPENSATION
Feedback Loop Types
In a typical LTC1704 switcher circuit, the feedback loop
consists of the modulator, the external inductor and
output capacitor, and the feedback amplifier and its com-

LTC1704EGN#PBF

Mfr. #:
Manufacturer:
Analog Devices / Linear Technology
Description:
Switching Voltage Regulators Step-Down DC/DC Controller
Lifecycle:
New from this manufacturer.
Delivery:
DHL FedEx Ups TNT EMS
Payment:
T/T Paypal Visa MoneyGram Western Union