SI1403BDL-T1-GE3

AN813
Vishay Siliconix
Document Number: 71236
12-Dec-03
www.vishay.com
1
Single-Channel LITTLE FOOTR SC-70 3-Pin and 6-Pin MOSFET
Recommended Pad Pattern and Thermal Peformance
INTRODUCTION BASIC PAD PATTERNS
This technical note discusses pin-outs, package outlines, pad
patterns, evaluation board layout, and thermal performance
for single-channel LITTLE FOOT power MOSFETs in the
SC-70 package. These new Vishay Siliconix devices are
intended for small-signal applications where a miniaturized
package is needed and low levels of current (around 350 mA)
need to be switched, either directly or by using a level shift
configuration. Vishay provides these single devices with a
range of on-resistance specifications and in both traditional
3-pin and new 6-pin versions. The new 6-pin SC-70 package
enables improved on-resistance values and enhanced
thermal performance compared to the 3-pin package.
PIN-OUT
Figure 1 shows the pin-out description and Pin 1 identification
for the single-channel SC-70 device in both 3-pin and 6-pin
configurations. The pin-out of the 6-pin device allows the use
of four pins as drain leads, which helps to reduce on-resistance
and junction-to-ambient thermal resistance.
SOT-323
SC-70 (3-LEADS)
1
2
3
Top View
G
S
D
SOT-363
SC-70 (6-LEADS)
6
4
1
2
3
5
Top View
D
D
G
FIGURE 1.
For package dimensions see outline drawings:
SC-70 (3-Leads) (http://www.vishay.com/doc?71153)
SC-70 (6-Leads) (http://www.vishay.com/doc?71154)
See Application Note 826, Recommended Minimum Pad
Patterns With Outline Drawing Access for Vishay Siliconix
MOSFETs, (http://www.vishay.com/doc?72286) for the basic
pad layout and dimensions for the 3-pin SC-70 and the 6-pin
SC-70. These pad patterns are sufficient for the low-power
applications for which this package is intended. Increasing the
pad pattern has little effect on thermal resistance for the 3-pin
device, reducing it by only 10% to 15%. But for the 6-pin
device, increasing the pad patterns yields a reduction in
thermal resistance on the order of 35% when using a 1-inch
square with full copper on both sides of the printed circuit board
(PCB). The availability of four drain leads rather than the
traditional single drain lead allows a better thermal path from
the package to the PCB and external environment.
EVALUATION BOARDS FOR THE SINGLE
SC70-3 AND SC70-6
Figure 2 shows the 3-pin and 6-pin SC-70 evaluation boards
(EVB). Both measure 0.6 inches by 0.5 inches. Their copper
pad traces are the same as described in the previous section,
Basic Pad Patterns. Both boards allow interrogation from the
outer pins to 6-pin DIP connections, permitting test sockets to
be used in evaluation testing.
The thermal performance of the single SC-70 has been
measured on the EVB for both the 3-pin and 6-pin devices, the
results shown in Figures 3 and 4. The minimum recommended
footprint on the evaluation board was compared with the
industry standard of 1-inch square FR4 PCB with copper on
both sides of the board.
FIGURE 2.
Front of Board SC70-3 Front of Board SC70-6
Back of Board, SC70-3 and SC70-6
ChipFETr
ChipFETr
vishay.com
AN813
Vishay Siliconix
www.vishay.com
2
Document Number: 71236
12-Dec-03
THERMAL PERFORMANCE
Junction-to-Foot Thermal Resistance
(the Package Performance)
Thermal performance for the 3-pin SC-70 measured as
junction-to-foot thermal resistance is 285_C/W typical,
340_C/W maximum. Junction-to-foot thermal resistance for
the 6-pin SC70-6 is 105_C/W typical, 130_C/W maximum —
a nearly two-thirds reduction compared with the 3-pin device.
The “foot” is the drain lead of the device as it connects with the
body. This improved performance is obtained by the increase
in drain leads from one to four on the 6-pin SC-70. Note that
these numbers are somewhat higher than other LITTLE FOOT
devices due to the limited thermal performance of the Alloy 42
lead-frame compared with a standard copper lead-frame.
Junction-to-Ambient Thermal Resistance
(dependent on PCB size)
The typical Rθ
JA
for the single 3-pin SC-70 is 360_C/W steady
state, compared with 180_C/W for the 6-pin SC-70. Maximum
ratings are 430_C/W for the 3-pin device versus 220_C/W for
the 6-pin device. All figures are based on the 1-inch square
FR4 test board.The following table shows how the thermal
resistance impacts power dissipation for the two different
pin-outs at two different ambient temperatures.
SC-70 (3-PIN)
Room Ambient 25 _C Elevated Ambient 60 _C
P
D
+
T
J(max)
* T
A
Rq
JA
P
D
+
150
o
C * 25
o
C
360
o
CńW
P
D
+ 347 mW
P
D
+
T
J(max)
* T
A
Rq
JA
P
D
+
150
o
C * 60
o
C
360
o
CńW
P
D
+ 250 mW
SC-70 (6-PIN)
Room Ambient 25 _C Elevated Ambient 60 _C
P
D
+
T
J(max)
* T
A
Rq
JA
P
D
+
150
o
C * 25
o
C
180
o
CńW
P
D
+ 694 mW
P
D
+
T
J(max)
* T
A
Rq
JA
P
D
+
150
o
C * 60
o
C
180
o
CńW
P
D
+ 500 mW
NOTE: Although they are intended for low-power applications,
devices in the 6-pin SC-70 will handle power dissipation in
excess of 0.5 W.
Testing
To aid comparison further, Figures 3 and 4 illustrate
single-channel SC-70 thermal performance on two different
board sizes and two different pad patterns. The results display
the thermal performance out to steady state and produce a
graphic account of the thermal performance variation between
the two packages. The measured steady state values of Rθ
JA
for the single 3-pin and 6-pin SC-70 are as follows:
LITTLE FOOT SC-70
3-Pin 6-Pin
1) Minimum recommended pad pattern
(see Figure 4) on the EVB.
410.31_C/W 329.7_C/W
2) Industry standard 1” square PCB with
maximum copper both sides.
360_C/W 211.8_C/W
The results show that designers can reduce thermal
resistance Rθ
JA
on the order of 20% simply by using the 6-pin
device rather than the 3-pin device. In this example, a 80_C/W
reduction was achieved without an increase in board area. If
increasing board size is an option, a further 118_C/W reduction
could be obtained by utilizing a 1-inch square PCB area.
Time (Secs)
FIGURE 3. Comparison of SC70-3 and SC70-6 on EVB
Thermal Resistance (C/W)
0
1
400
80
160
100 1000
240
1010
-1
10
-2
10
-3
10
-4
10
-5
0.5 in x 0.6 in EVB
3-pin
320
Time (Secs)
FIGURE 4. Comparison of SC70-3 and SC70-6 on 1”
Square FR4 PCB
Thermal Resistance (C/W)
0
1
400
80
160
100 1000
240
1010
-1
10
-2
10
-3
10
-4
10
-5
1” Square FR4 PCB
320
6-pin
3-pin
6-pin
Application Note 826
Vishay Siliconix
www.vishay.com Document Number: 72602
18 Revision: 21-Jan-08
APPLICATION NOTE
RECOMMENDED MINIMUM PADS FOR SC-70: 6-Lead
0.096
(2.438)
Recommended Minimum Pads
Dimensions in Inches/(mm)
0.067
(1.702)
0.026
(0.648)
0.045
(1.143)
0.016
(0.406)
0.026
(0.648)
0.010
(0.241)
Return to Index
Return to Index

SI1403BDL-T1-GE3

Mfr. #:
Manufacturer:
Vishay / Siliconix
Description:
MOSFET -20V Vds 12V Vgs SC-70
Lifecycle:
New from this manufacturer.
Delivery:
DHL FedEx Ups TNT EMS
Payment:
T/T Paypal Visa MoneyGram Western Union

Products related to this Datasheet