Advanced Clock Drivers Device Data
Freescale Semiconductor 7
MPC9653A
Calculation of Part-to-Part Skew
The MPC9653A zero delay buffer supports applications
where critical clock signal timing can be maintained across
several devices. If the reference clock inputs of two or more
MPC9653As are connected together, the maximum overall
timing uncertainty from the common PCLK input to any output
is:
t
SK(PP)
= t
(
)
+ t
SK(O)
+ t
PD, LINE(FB)
+ t
JIT(
)
CF
This maximum timing uncertainty consist of 4 components:
static phase offset, output skew, feedback board trace delay
and I/O (phase) jitter:
Figure 4. MPC9653A Maximum Device-to-Device Skew
Due to the statistical nature of I/O jitter a RMS value (1 σ)
is specified. I/O jitter numbers for other confidence factors
(CF) can be derived from Table 8.
The feedback trace delay is determined by the board
layout and can be used to fine-tune the effective delay
through each device. In the following example calculation a
I/O jitter confidence factor of 99.7% (± 3σ) is assumed,
resulting in a worst case timing uncertainty from input to any
output of –197 ps to 297 ps (at 125 MHz reference frequency)
relative to PCLK:
t
SK(PP)
= [-17ps...117ps] + [-150ps...150ps] +
[(10ps @ -3)...(10ps @ 3)] + t
PD, LINE(FB)
t
SK(PP)
= [-197ps...297ps] + t
PD, LINE(FB)
Due to the frequency dependence of the I/O jitter,
Figure 5, can be used for a more precise timing performance
analysis.
Figure 5. Maximum I/O Jitter versus Frequency
Driving Transmission Lines
The MPC9653A clock driver was designed to drive high
speed signals in a terminated transmission line environment.
To provide the optimum flexibility to the user the output
drivers were designed to exhibit the lowest impedance
possible. With an output impedance of less than 20 the
drivers can drive either parallel or series terminated
transmission lines. For more information on transmission
lines the reader is referred to Freescale Semiconductor
application note AN1091. In most high performance clock
networks point-to-point distribution of signals is the method of
choice. In a point-to-point scheme either series terminated or
parallel terminated transmission lines can be used. The
parallel technique terminates the signal at the end of the line
with a 50 resistance to V
CC
÷ 2.
This technique draws a fairly high level of DC current and
thus only a single terminated line can be driven by each
output of the MPC9653A clock driver. For the series
terminated case however there is no DC current draw, thus
the outputs can drive multiple series terminated lines.
Figure 5, illustrates an output driving a single series
terminated line versus two series terminated lines in parallel.
When taken to its extreme the fanout of the MPC9653A clock
driver is effectively doubled due to its capability to drive
multiple lines.
Table 8. Confidence Factor CF
CF Probability of clock edge within the distribution
± 1σ 0.68268948
± 2σ 0.95449988
± 3σ 0.99730007
± 4σ 0.99993663
± 5σ 0.99999943
± 6σ 0.99999999
t
PD,LINE(FB)
t
JIT()
+t
SK(O)
—t(ý)
+t
()
t
JIT()
+t
SK(O)
t
SK(PP)
Max. skew
PCLK
Common
QFB
Device 1
Any Q
Device 1
QFB
Device2
Any Q
Device 2
30
20
10
0
25 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125
FB = ÷ 8FB=÷ 4
3I/O Jitter [ps] RMS
Reference Frequency [MHz]
Advanced Clock Drivers Device Data
8 Freescale Semiconductor
MPC9653A
Figure 6. Single versus Dual Transmission Lines
The waveform plots in Figure 7 show the simulation
results of an output driving a single line versus two lines. In
both cases the drive capability of the MPC9653A output
buffer is more than sufficient to drive 50 transmission lines
on the incident edge. Note from the delay measurements in
the simulations a delta of only 43 ps exists between the two
differently loaded outputs. This suggests that the dual line
driving need not be used exclusively to maintain the tight
output-to-output skew of the MPC9653A. The output
waveform in Figure 7 shows a step in the waveform, this step
is caused by the impedance mismatch seen looking into the
driver. The parallel combination of the 36 series resistor
plus the output impedance does not match the parallel
combination of the line impedances. The voltage wave
launched down the two lines will equal:
V
L
=V
S
(Z
0
÷ (R
S
+ R
0
+ Z
0
))
Z
0
=50 || 50
R
S
=36 || 36
R
0
=14
V
L
= 3.0 (25 ÷ (18 + 14 + 25)
=1.31V
At the load end the voltage will double, due to the near
unity reflection coefficient, to 2.6 V. It will then increment
towards the quiescent 3.0 V in steps separated by one round
trip delay (in this case 4.0 ns).
Figure 7. Single versus Dual Waveforms
Since this step is well above the threshold region it will not
cause any false clock triggering, however designers may be
uncomfortable with unwanted reflections on the line. To better
match the impedances when driving multiple lines the
situation in Figure 8, should be used. In this case the series
terminating resistors are reduced such that when the parallel
combination is added to the output buffer impedance the line
impedance is perfectly matched.
Figure 8. Optimized Dual Line Termination
Figure 9. MPC9653A AC Test Reference
14
In
MPC9653A
Output
Buffer
R
S
= 36
Z
O
= 50
OutA
14
In
MPC9653A
Output
Buffer
R
S
= 36
Z
O
= 50
OutB0
R
S
= 36
Z
O
= 50
OutB1
Time (ns)
Voltage (V)
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
24 68101214
OutB
t
D
= 3.9386
OutA
t
D
= 3.8956
In
14
MPC9653A
Output
Buffer
R
S
= 22
Z
O
= 50
R
S
= 22
Z
O
= 50
14 + 22 || 22 = 50 || 50
25 = 25
Differential
Pulse Generator
Z = 50
R
T
= 50
Z
O
= 50
R
T
= 50
Z
O
= 50
MPC9653A DUT
V
TT
V
TT
Advanced Clock Drivers Device Data
Freescale Semiconductor 9
MPC9653A
Figure 12. Output Duty Cycle (DC)
Figure 10. Output-to-Output Skew t
SK(O)
The pin-to-pin skew is defined as the worst case difference
in propagation delay between any similar delay path within a
single device
V
CC
V
CC
÷ 2
GND
V
CC
V
CC
÷ 2
GND
t
SK(O)
The time from the PLL controlled edge to the non controlled
edge, divided by the time between PLL controlled edges,
expressed as a percentage
V
CC
V
CC
÷ 2
GND
t
P
T
0
DC = t
P
/T
0
x 100%
Figure 14. Cycle-to-Cycle Jitter
Figure 13. I/O Jitter
Figure 16. Output Transition Time Test
Reference
t
F
t
R
V
CC
=3.3V
2.4
0.55
T
JIT()
= |T
0
–T
1
mean|
PCLK
PCLK
Ext_FB
The deviation in t
0
for a controlled edge with respect to a T
0
mean in a random sample of cycles
The variation in cycle time of a signal between adjacent cycles,
over a random sample of adjacent cycle pairs
T
N
T
JIT(CC)
= |T
N
–T
N+1
|
T
N+1
The deviation in cycle time of a signal with respect to the ideal
period over a random sample of cycles
T
JIT(PER)
= |T
N
–1/f
0
|
T
0
Figure 15. Period Jitter
Figure 11. Propagation delay (t
(PD)
, static phase
offset) Test Reference
V
CC
V
CC
÷ 2
GND
t
(PD)
PCLK
FB_IN
PCLK
V
PP
= 0.8 V
V
CMR =
V
CC
–1.3 V

MPC9653AFA

Mfr. #:
Manufacturer:
NXP / Freescale
Description:
Clock Generators & Support Products 3.3V 125MHz Clock Generator
Lifecycle:
New from this manufacturer.
Delivery:
DHL FedEx Ups TNT EMS
Payment:
T/T Paypal Visa MoneyGram Western Union

Products related to this Datasheet