13
FN9168.2
September 22, 2006
transient. An aluminum electrolytic capacitor's ESR value is
related to the case size with lower ESR available in larger
case sizes. However, the equivalent series inductance
(ESL) of these capacitors increases with case size and can
reduce the usefulness of the capacitor to high slew-rate
transient loading. Unfortunately, ESL is not always a
specified parameter. Work with your capacitor supplier and
measure the capacitor’s impedance with frequency to
select a suitable component. In most cases, multiple
electrolytic capacitors of small case size perform better
than a single large case capacitor.
Input Capacitor Selection
Use a mix of input bypass capacitors to control the voltage
overshoot across the MOSFETs. Use small ceramic
capacitors for high frequency decoupling and bulk capacitors
to supply the current needed each time Q1 turns on. Place the
small ceramic capacitors physically close to the MOSFETs
and between the drain of upper FET Q1 and the source of
lower FET Q2.
The important parameters for the bulk input capacitor are the
voltage rating and the RMS current rating. For reliable
operation, select the bulk capacitor with voltage and current
ratings above the maximum input voltage and largest RMS
current required by the circuit. The capacitor voltage rating
should be at least 1.25 times greater than the maximum input
voltage and a voltage rating of 1.5 times is a conservative
guideline. The RMS current rating requirement for the input
capacitor of a buck regulator is approximately half the DC load
current. Several electrolytic capacitors may be needed.
Bootstrap Capacitor Selection
The boot diode is internal to the ISL6549, and uses PVCC5 to
charge the external boot capacitor. The size of the bootstrap
capacitor can be chosen by using the equations in Equation
12.
The last equation plugs in some typical values: N = 1;
Q
G
is 33nC, V
IN
is 12V, V
GS
is 11V, V
max
= 1V. In this
example, C
BOOT
0.113µF. This value is often rounded to
0.1µF or 0.22µF as a starting value. The bootstrap capacitors
for the ISL6549 can usually be rated for 6.3V.
Switcher FET Considerations
The IC was designed for nominal 12V supply for V
IN1
(drain of
upper FET Q1). However, it will work with most any voltage
(from other supplies or other regulator outputs) down to
around 1V, as long as the input is above the output by a
sufficient margin (based on practical duty cycle limitations and
upper FET R
DS(ON)
constraints). For example, although the
IC can function at near 100% duty cycle, the voltage drop due
to the R
DS(ON)
of the upper FET at full load current will limit
the practical duty cycle to something less than 100%. So the
V
IN1
range is roughly 1.0V up to 12V, with the V
OUT1
range
slightly below it. Therefore, the FETs need to be rated for
drain-source breakdown above the V
IN1
voltage; 20V and
30V ratings are common.
The ISL6549 gate drivers (UGATE and LGATE) were
designed to drive up to 2 upper and 2 lower 8 Ld SOIC FETs;
when the FETs are properly sized, the output currents can
range from under 1A to over 20A. Driving more or bigger FETs
is not recommended; even if there is enough current (from the
internal PVCC5 regulator), the gate driver waveforms may be
degraded. DPAK FET packages can be used, but D
2
PAK
FETs are not recommended, due to the higher inductance of
the package leads. For example, the inductance in the source
of the lower FET can create large negative spikes on the
PHASE node when the UGATE turns off.
Both the UGATE and LGATE voltages are derived from the
internal PVCC5 internal regulator, typically 5.25V. UGATE is
only about 5.0V above PHASE, due to the drop in the internal
BOOT diode charging the BOOT capacitor; LGATE sees the
full 5.25V. So both are considered “5V” drivers; this affects the
FET selection in two ways. First, the FET gate-source voltage
rating can be as low as 12V (this rating is usually consistent
with the 20V or 30V breakdown chosen above). Second, the
FETs must have a low threshold voltage (around 1V), in order
to have its R
DS(ON)
rating at V
GS
= 4.5V in the 10m-20m
range. While some FETs are also rated with gate voltages as
low as 2.7V, with typical thresholds under 1V, these can cause
application problems. As LGATE shuts off the lower FET, it
does not take much ringing in the LGATE signal to turn the
lower FET back on, while the Upper FET is also turning on,
causing some shoot-through current. So avoid FETs with
thresholds below 1V.
Another set of important parameters are the turn-on and
turn-off times (internal propagation delays, how long before
the output starts to switch) and the rise and fall times (external
delay to complete the switching). The UGATE and LGATE
drivers use an adaptive technique to determine the dead time
(when both gate drivers signals are low). Comparators sense
when each driver is getting close to GND (such that its FET is
close to being off), before turning on the other. This technique
minimizes the dead time to the 10ns-20ns range. So if either
C
BOOT
Q
GATE
V
--------------------
Q
GATE
NQ
G
V
IN
V
GS
----------------------------------=
C
BOOT
Q
GATE
V
--------------------
NQ
G
V
IN
V
GS
V
----------------------------------
13312
50.7
----------------------------
0.113µF===
where
N is the number of upper FETs
Q
G
is the total gate charge per upper FET
V
IN
is the input voltage
V
GS
is the gate-source voltage (~5V for ISL6549)
V is the change in boot voltage before and immediately
after the transfer of charge; typically 0.7V to 1.0V
and
(EQ. 12)
ISL6549
14
FN9168.2
September 22, 2006
FET is particularly slow in these parameters, there is a greater
chance that shoot-through current will occur.
As referenced in the “Block Diagram” on page 2, the UGATE
signal is referenced to PHASE signal. The deadtime
comparator also looks at the difference (UGATE - PHASE).
This is significant when viewing the gate driver waveforms on
an oscilloscope. One simple indication of shoot-through (or
insufficient deadtime) is when the UGATE and LGATE signals
overlap. But in this case, one should look at UGATE-PHASE
(either by a math function of the two signals, or by using a
differential probe measurement) compared to LGATE.
Figure 12 shows an example of this. It looks as if the UGATE
and LGATE signals have crossed, but the UGATE-PHASE
signal does not cross the LGATE.
One important consideration is negative spikes on the PHASE
node as it goes low. The upper FET is turning off, but before
the lower FET can take over, stray inductance in the layout
(on the board, or even the inductance of some components,
such as D
2
PAK FETs) can contribute to the PHASE going
negative.
There is no maximum spec for PHASE spike below GND,
however, there is an absolute maximum rating for
(BOOT - PHASE) of 7V; exceeding this limit can cause
damage to the IC, and possibly to the system. Since the
BOOT signal is typically 5V above the PHASE node most of
the time, it only takes a few volts of a spike on either signal to
exceed the limit. A good design should be characterized by
using the math function or differential probe, and monitoring
these signals for compliance, especially during full loads,
where the signals are usually the noisiest. Slowing down the
turn-off of the upper FET may help, while at other times,
sometimes the problem may just be the choice of FETs.
If the power efficiency of the system is important, then other
FET parameters are also considered. Efficiency is a measure
of power losses from input to output, and it contains two major
components: losses in the IC (mostly in the gate drivers) and
losses in the FETs. Optimizing the sum involves many
trade-offs (for example, raising the voltage of the gate drivers
typically adds power to the IC side, but may reduce some
power on the FET side). For low duty cycle applications (such
as 12V in to 1.5V out), the upper FET is usually chosen for low
gate charge, since switching losses are key, while the lower
FET is chosen for low R
DS(ON)
, since it is on most of the time.
For high duty cycles (such as 3.3V in to 2.5V out), the
opposite is true.
In summary, the following parameters may need to be
considered in choosing the right FETs for an application:
drain-source breakdown voltage rating, gate-source rating,
maximum current, thermal and package considerations, low
gate threshold voltage, gate charge, R
DS(ON)
at 4.5V, and
switching speed. And, of course, the board layout constraints
and cost also are factored into the decision.
Linear FET Considerations
The linear FET is chosen primarily for thermal performance.
The current for the linear output is generally limited by the
power dissipation (P = (V
IN2
- V
OUT2
) * I), and the FET
thermal rating for getting the heat out of the package, and
spreading it out on the board, especially when no heatsinks or
airflow is available. It is generally not recommended to parallel
two FETs in order to get higher current or to spread out the
heat, as the FETs would need to be very well-matched in
order to share the current properly. Should this approach be
desired, and as perfectly matched FETs are seldom available,
a small resistor, or PCB trace of suitable resistance placed in
the source of each of the FETs can be used to improve the
current balance.
The maximum V
OUT2
voltage allowed is determined by
several factors:
Power dissipation, as described earlier
Input voltage available
LDO_DR voltage
FET chosen
The voltage cannot be any higher than the input voltage
available, and the max V
IN2
is 12V (13.2V for a ±10% supply).
The LDO_DR voltage is driven from the VCC12 rail; allowing
for headroom, the typical maximum voltage is 11V (lower as
VCC12 goes to its minimum of 10.8V). So the maximum
output voltage will be at least a V
GS
drop (which includes the
FET threshold voltage) below the 11V, at the maximum load
current; some additional headroom is usually needed to
handle transient conditions. So a practical typical value
around 8V may be possible, but remember to also factor in
the variations for worst case conditions on V
IN2
and the FET
parameters. As long as the V
IN2
is low enough such that
headroom versus VCC12 is not a problem, then the maximum
output voltage is just below V
IN2
, based on the R
DS(ON)
drop
at maximum current.
The input supply for V
IN2
can also be any available supply
less than 12V, subject to the considerations above. The
drain-source breakdown voltage of the FET should be greater
FIGURE 12. GATE DRIVER WAVEFORMS
UGATE (4V/DIV)
UGATE-PHASE (4V/DIV)
PHASE (4V/DIV)
LGATE (4V/DIV)
GND>
GND>
GND>
GND>
ISL6549
15
FN9168.2
September 22, 2006
than the V
IN2
voltage. The FET’s gate-source rating should be
greater than 12V (even though the output voltage may not
require such a high gate voltage, load transients or other
disturbances might force LDO_DR to momentarily approach
12V). The FET threshold is not critical, except for the cases
where the LDO_DR headroom is diminished. And finally, the
package (and board area allowed) must be able to handle the
maximum power dissipation expected.
Application Guidelines
Layout Considerations
Layout is very important in high frequency switching converter
design. With power devices switching efficiently at 600kHz,
the resulting current transitions from one device to another
cause voltage spikes across the interconnecting impedances
and parasitic circuit elements. These voltage spikes can
degrade efficiency, radiate noise into the circuit, and lead to
device overvoltage stress. Careful component layout and
printed circuit board design minimizes the voltage spikes in
the converters.
As an example, consider the turn-off transition of the PWM
upper MOSFET. Prior to turn-off, the MOSFET is carrying the
full load current. During turn-off, current stops flowing in the
upper MOSFET and is picked up by the lower MOSFET and
parasitic diode. Any parasitic inductance in the switched
current path generates a large voltage spike during the
switching interval. Careful component selection, tight layout of
the critical components, and short, wide traces minimizes the
magnitude of voltage spikes.
There are two sets of critical components in a DC/DC converter
using the ISL6549. The switching components are the most
critical because they switch large amounts of energy, and
therefore tend to generate large amounts of noise. Next are the
small signal components which connect to sensitive nodes or
supply critical bypass current and signal coupling.
A multilayer printed circuit board is recommended. Figure 13
shows the connections of the critical components in the
converter. Capacitors C
IN
and C
OUT
could each represent
numerous physical capacitors. Dedicate one solid layer,
usually a middle layer of the PC board, for a ground plane and
make all critical component ground connections through vias
to this layer. Dedicate another solid layer as a power plane
and break this plane into smaller islands of common voltage
levels. Keep the metal runs from the PHASE terminal to the
output inductor short. The power plane should support the
input and output power nodes. Use copper filled polygons on
the top and bottom circuit layers for the phase node. Use the
remaining printed circuit layers for small signal wiring. The
wiring traces from the LGATE and UGATE pins to the
MOSFET gates should be kept short and wide enough to
easily handle the several Amps of drive current.
The critical small signal components include any bypass
capacitors, feedback components, and compensation
components. Position the bypass capacitors, C
4
, C
5
, and C
6
close to their pins with a local GND connection, or via directly
to the ground plane. R12 should be placed near VCC5 and
PVCC5 pins. FS_DIS resistor R7 should be near the FS-DIS
pin, and its GND return should be short, and kept away from
the noisy FET GND. Place the PWM converter compensation
components close to the FB and COMP pins. The feedback
resistors for both regulators should also be located as close
as possible to the relevant FB pin with vias tied straight to the
ground plane as required.
Then the switching components should be placed close to the
ISL6549. Minimize the length of the connections between the
input capacitors, C
IN
, and the power switches by placing them
nearby. Position both the ceramic and bulk input capacitors as
close to the upper MOSFET drain as possible, and make the
GND returns (from lower FET source to VIN cap GND) short.
Position the output inductor and output capacitors between
the upper MOSFET and lower MOSFET and the load.
References
Applications Note: AN1201
Visit us on the internet: www.intersil.com
FIGURE 13. PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD POWER PLANES
AND ISLANDS
V
OUT1
VCC5
ISLAND ON POWER PLANE LAYER
ISLAND ON CIRCUIT PLANE LAYER
L
OUT
C
OUT1
C
IN1
V
IN1
KEY
COMP
ISL6549
UGATE
R
4
R
2
C
5
FB
LDO_DR
GND
VCC5
R1
V
OUT2
LDO_FB
C
2
VIA CONNECTION TO GROUND PLANE
C
OUT2
LOAD
LOAD
Q1
V
IN2
R5
R6
PHASE
R
3
C
3
C
1
Q2
VCC12
C
4
GND
VCC12
Q3
LGATE
C
IN2
PVCC5
C
6
PGND
PVCC5
R12
BOOT
C
7
FS_DIS
R
7
ISL6549

ISL6549IBZ-T

Mfr. #:
Manufacturer:
Renesas / Intersil
Description:
Switching Controllers SINGLE 12V SUPPLY DLG 14LD N
Lifecycle:
New from this manufacturer.
Delivery:
DHL FedEx Ups TNT EMS
Payment:
T/T Paypal Visa MoneyGram Western Union