13
LT1794
Similar results can be obtained with the LT1794CSW in the
wide SO-20 package. With this package heat is conducted
primarily through the V
pins, Pins 4 to 7 and 14 to 17;
these pins should be soldered directly to the PCB metal
plane.
Important Note: The metal planes used for heat sinking
the LT1794 are electrically connected to the negative
supply potential of the driver, typically –12V. These
planes must be isolated from any other power planes
used in the board design.
When PCB cards containing multiple ports are inserted
into a rack in an enclosed cabinet, it is often necessary to
provide airflow through the cabinet and over the cards.
This is also very effective in reducing the junction-to-
ambient thermal resistance of each line driver. To a limit,
this thermal resistance can be reduced approximately
5°C/W for every 100lfpm of laminar airflow.
Layout and Passive Components
With a gain bandwidth product of 200MHz the LT1794
requires attention to detail in order to extract maximum
performance. Use a ground plane, short lead lengths and
a combination of RF-quality supply bypass capacitors (i.e.,
0.1µF). As the primary applications have high drive cur-
rent, use low ESR supply bypass capacitors (1µF to 10µF).
The parallel combination of the feedback resistor and gain
setting resistor on the inverting input can combine with the
input capacitance to form a pole that can cause frequency
peaking. In general, use feedback resistors of 1k or less.
Compensation
The LT1794 is stable in a gain 10 or higher for any supply
and resistive load. It is easily compensated for lower gains
with a single resistor or a resistor plus a capacitor.
Figure␣ 9 shows that for inverting gains, a resistor from the
inverting node to AC ground guarantees stability if the
parallel combination of R
C
and R
G
is less than or equal to
R
F
/9. For lowest distortion and DC output offset, a series
capacitor, C
C
, can be used to reduce the noise gain at
lower frequencies. The break frequency produced by R
C
and C
C
should be less than 5MHz to minimize peaking.
Figure 10 shows compensation in the noninverting con-
figuration. The R
C
, C
C
network acts similarly to the invert-
ing case. The input impedance is not reduced because the
network is bootstrapped. This network can also be placed
between the inverting input and an AC ground.
Another compensation scheme for noninverting circuits is
shown in Figure 11. The circuit is unity gain at low
frequency and a gain of 1 + R
F
/R
G
at high frequency. The
DC output offset is reduced by a factor of ten. The
techniques of Figures 10 and 11 can be combined as
shown in Figure 12. The gain is unity at low frequencies,
1 + R
F
/R
G
at mid-band and for stability, a gain of 10 or
greater at high frequencies.
Figure 9. Compensation for Inverting Gains
APPLICATIO S I FOR ATIO
WUUU
R
G
R
C
V
O
V
I
C
C
(OPTIONAL)
+
1794 F09
R
F
=
–R
F
R
G
V
O
V
I
< 5MHz
1
2πR
C
C
C
(R
C
|| R
G
) R
F
/9
R
C
V
O
V
I
C
C
(OPTIONAL)
+
1794 F10
R
F
R
G
= 1 +
R
F
R
G
V
O
V
I
< 5MHz
1
2πR
C
C
C
(R
C
|| R
G
) R
F
/9
Figure 10. Compensation for Noninverting Gains
+
1794 F11
R
F
R
G
V
i
V
O
C
C
< 5MHz
1
2πR
G
C
C
R
G
R
F
/9
= 1 (LOW FREQUENCIES)
(HIGH FREQUENCIES)
V
O
V
I
= 1 +
R
F
R
G
Figure 11. Alternate Noninverting Compensation
14
LT1794
In differential driver applications, as shown on the first
page of this data sheet, it is recommended that the gain
setting resistor be comprised of two equal value resistors
connected to a good AC ground at high frequencies. This
ensures that the feedback factor of each amplifier remains
less than 0.1 at any frequency. The midpoint of the
resistors can be directly connected by ground, with the
resulting DC gain to the V
OS
of the amplifiers, or just
bypassed to ground with a 1000pF or larger capacitor.
Line Driving Back-Termination
The standard method of cable or line back-termination is
shown in Figure 13. The cable/line is terminated in its
characteristic impedance (50, 75, 100, 135, etc.).
A back-termination resistor also equal to the chararacteristic
impedance should be used for maximum pulse fidelity of
outgoing signals, and to terminate the line for incoming
signals in a full-duplex application. There are three main
drawbacks to this approach. First, the power dissipated in
the load and back-termination resistors is equal so half of
the power delivered by the amplifier is wasted in the
termination resistor. Second, the signal is halved so the
gain of the amplifer must be doubled to have the same
overall gain to the load. The increase in gain increases
noise and decreases bandwidth (which can also increase
distortion). Third, the output swing of the amplifier is
doubled which can limit the power it can deliver to the load
for a given power supply voltage.
An alternate method of back-termination is shown in
Figure 14. Positive feedback increases the effective back-
termination resistance so R
BT
can be reduced by a factor
of n. To analyze this circuit, first ground the input. As R
BT
␣=
R
L
/n, and assuming R
P2
>>R
L
we require that:
V
A
= V
O
(1 – 1/n) to increase the effective value of
R
BT
by n.
V
P
= V
O
(1 – 1/n)/(1 + R
F
/R
G
)
V
O
= V
P
(1 + R
P2
/R
P1
)
Eliminating V
P
, we get the following:
(1 + R
P2
/R
P1
) = (1 + R
F
/R
G
)/(1 – 1/n)
For example, reducing R
BT
by a factor of n = 4, and with an
amplifer gain of (1 + R
F
/R
G
) = 10 requires that R
P2
/R
P1
=␣ 12.3.
APPLICATIO S I FOR ATIO
WUUU
R
C
V
O
V
I
C
C
+
1794 F12
R
F
R
G
C
BIG
R
F
R
G
= 1 AT LOW FREQUENCIES
= 1 + AT MEDIUM FREQUENCIES
R
F
(R
C
|| R
G
)
= 1 + AT HIGH FREQUENCIES
V
O
V
I
Figure 12. Combination Compensation
+
1794 F13
R
F
R
BT
CABLE OR LINE WITH
CHARACTERISTIC IMPEDANCE R
L
R
G
V
O
V
I
R
L
(1 + R
F
/R
G
)
=
V
O
V
I
1
2
R
BT
= R
L
Figure 13. Standard Cable/Line Back Termination
+
1794 F14
R
F
R
BT
R
P2
R
P1
R
G
V
I
V
A
V
P
V
O
R
L
R
F
R
G
1 +
R
L
n
=
V
O
V
I
= 1 –
1
n
FOR R
BT
=
()
R
F
R
G
1 +
()
R
P1
R
P1
+ R
P2
R
P1
R
P2
+ R
P1
R
P2
/(R
P2
+ R
P1
)
()
1 + 1/n
Figure 14. Back Termination Using Postive Feedback
15
LT1794
Note that the overall gain is increased:
V
V
RRR
nRRRRR
O
I
PPP
FG P P P
=
+
()
+
()
+
()
[]
−+
()
[]
221
12 1
11 1
/
// / /
A simpler method of using positive feedback to reduce the
back-termination is shown in Figure 15. In this case, the
drivers are driven differentially and provide complemen-
tary outputs. Grounding the inputs, we see there is invert-
ing gain of –R
F
/R
P
from –V
O
to V
A
V
A
= V
O
(R
F
/R
P
)
and assuming R
P
>> R
L
, we require
V
A
= V
O
(1 – 1/n)
solving
R
F
/R
P
= 1 – 1/n
So to reduce the back-termination by a factor of 3 choose
R
F
/R
P
= 2/3. Note that the overall gain is increased to:
V
O
/V
I
= (1 + R
F
/R
G
+ R
F
/R
P
)/[2(1 – R
F
/R
P
)]
Using positive feedback is often referred to as active
termination.
Figure 17 shows a full-rate ADSL line driver incorporating
positive feedback to reduce the power lost in the back
termination resistors by 40% yet still maintains the proper
impedance match to the100 characteristic line imped-
ance. This circuit also reduces the transformer turns ratio
over the standard line driving approach resulting in lower
peak current requirements. With lower current and less
power loss in the back termination resistors, this driver
dissipates only 1W of power, a 30% reduction.
While the power savings of positive feedback are attractive
there is one important system consideration to be ad-
dressed, received signal sensitivity. The signal received
from the line is sensed across the back termination resis-
tors. With positive feedback, signals are present on both
ends of the R
BT
resistors, reducing the sensed amplitude.
Extra gain may be required in the receive channel to
compensate, or a completely separate receive path may be
implemented through a separate line coupling transformer.
A demo board, DC306A, is available for the LT1794. This
demo board is a complete line driver with an LT1361
receiver included. It allows the evaluation of both standard
and active termination approaches. It also has circuitry
built in to evaluate the effects of operating with reduced
supply current.
Considerations for Fault Protection
The basic line driver design, shown on the front page of
this data sheet, presents a direct DC path between the
outputs of the two amplifiers. An imbalance in the DC
biasing potentials at the noninverting inputs through
either a fault condition or during turn-on of the system can
create a DC voltage differential between the two amplifier
outputs. This condition can force a considerable amount
of current to flow as it is limited only by the small valued
back-termination resistors and the DC resistance of the
transformer primary. This high current can possibly cause
the power supply voltage source to drop significantly
impacting overall system performance. If left unchecked,
the high DC current can heat the LT1794 to thermal
shutdown.
APPLICATIO S I FOR ATIO
WUUU
+
R
BT
R
F
R
G
R
P
R
P
R
G
R
L
R
L
–V
I
V
A
–V
A
V
I
–V
O
V
O
+
R
BT
1794 F15
R
F
R
L
n
=
V
O
V
I
n =
1 –2
FOR R
BT
=
R
F
R
P
R
F
R
P
+
R
F
R
G
1 +
1 –
R
F
R
P
1
()
Figure 15. Back Termination Using Differential Postive Feedback

LT1794IFE#PBF

Mfr. #:
Manufacturer:
Analog Devices Inc.
Description:
High Speed Operational Amplifiers 2x 500mA, 200MHz xDSL Line Drvr Amp
Lifecycle:
New from this manufacturer.
Delivery:
DHL FedEx Ups TNT EMS
Payment:
T/T Paypal Visa MoneyGram Western Union