MAX1761
Small, Dual, High-Efficiency
Buck Controller for Notebooks
16 ______________________________________________________________________________________
Find a low-loss inductor having the lowest possible DC
resistance that fits in the allotted dimensions. Ferrite
cores are often the best choice, although powdered
iron is inexpensive and works well at 250kHz. The core
must be large enough not to saturate at the peak induc-
tor current (I
PEAK
):
I
PEAK
= I
LOAD(MAX)
- 1/2 LIR
I
LOAD(MAX)
=
(1 - 0.5 LIR) I
LOAD(MAX)
Setting Current Limit
The minimum current-limit threshold must be great
enough to support the maximum load current plus
some safety margin. For the circuit in Figure 1, with a
desired 2.5A maximum load current, the worst-case
current limit is set at 3.0A, providing a 20% safety mar-
gin. Under these conditions, the valley of the inductor
current waveform occurs at:
I
VALLEY
= I
LOAD(MAX)
- 1/2 LIR
I
LOAD(MAX)
=
(1 - 0.5 LIR) I
LOAD(MAX)
The required valley current is I
VALLEY
= 3A - 1/2 (0.35)
2.5A = 2.56A. Next, the current-sense feedback volt-
age must be scaled taking into account the tolerance of
the CS_ current-limit threshold and the maximum MOS-
FET drain-source on-resistance (R
DS(ON)
) variation
over temperature. The minimum current-limit threshold
at the CS_ pins is 92mV. The worst-case maximum
value for (R
DS(ON)
) over temperature is 50m. At
2.56A, the voltage developed across the low-side
switch is 128mV. A resistive voltage-divider with a
0.703 attenuation ratio is necessary to scale this volt-
age to the 92mV CS_ threshold.
A current-sense resistor can be used if a more accu-
rate current limit is needed than is available when using
the MOSFET (R
DS(ON)
(Figure 6). Placing the sense
resistor between the source of the low-side MOSFET
and ground provides a very accurate sense point for
the CS_ inputs. Alternatively, a small sense resistor can
be used in series with the low-side MOSFET to ballast
the device and reduce the temperature coefficient of
the current limit when sensing at the inductors
switched node. This provides a compromise between
sensing across the MOSFET device alone or using a
large sense resistor.
Output Capacitor Selection
The output filter capacitor must have low enough effec-
tive series resistance (ESR) to meet output ripple and
load-transient requirements, yet have high enough ESR
to satisfy the stability criterion.
In CPU V
CORE
converters and other applications where
the output is subject to violent load transients, the out-
put capacitors size depends on how much ESR is
needed to prevent the output from dipping too low
under a load transient. Ignoring the sag due to finite
capacitance:
In non-CPU applications, the output capacitors size
depends on how much ESR is needed to maintain an
acceptable level of output voltage ripple:
The actual required µF capacitance value relates to the
physical size needed to achieve low ESR as well as to
the chemistry of the capacitor technology. Thus, the
capacitor is usually selected by ESR and voltage rating
rather than by capacitance value (this is true of tanta-
lums, SP, POS, and other electrolytics).
When using low-capacitance filter capacitors, such as
ceramic or polymer types, capacitor size is usually
determined by the capacitance needed to prevent
V
SAG
and V
SOAR
from causing problems during load
transients. Generally, once enough capacitance is
added to meet the V
SOAR
requirement, undershoot at
the rising load edge is no longer a problem (see the
V
SAG
equation in Design Procedure). The amount of
overshoot due to stored inductor energy can be calcu-
lated as:
where I
PEAK
is the peak inductor current.
Stability Considerations
Stability is determined by the value of the ESR zero rel-
ative to the switching frequency. The point of instability
is given by the following equation:
ƒ=
ƒ
ESR
π
V
L
×(I
2CV
PEAK
OUT
2
)
R
Vp - p
LIR I
ESR
LOAD(MAX)
×
R
V
I
ESR
DIP
LOAD(MAX)
L
-
=
×××
=
25 20 25
20 350 0 35 2 5
71
.( .)
..
.
VV V
V kHz A
Hµ
MAX1761
Small, Dual, High-Efficiency
Buck Controller for Notebooks
______________________________________________________________________________________ 17
where:
For a typical 350kHz application, the ESR zero frequen-
cy must be well below 100kHz, preferably below
50kHz. Tantalum and OS-CON capacitors have typical
ESR zero frequencies of 15kHz. Sanyo POS capacitors
have typical ESR zero frequencies of 20kHz. In the
design example used for inductor selection, the ESR
needed to support 50mVp-p ripple is 50mV / LIR(2.5A)
= 57.1m. A single150µF/6.3V Sanyo POS capacitor
provides 55m (max) ESR. This ESR results in a zero at
19.3kHz, well within the bounds of stability.
Dont put high-value ceramic capacitors directly across
the fast feedback inputs (FB_/OUT_ to GND) without
taking precautions to ensure stability. Large ceramic
capacitors can have a high-ESR zero frequency and
may cause erratic, unstable operation. However, its
easy to add enough series resistance by placing the
capacitors a couple of inches downstream from the
junction of the inductor and FB_/OUT_ pin.
Unstable operation manifests itself in two related but
distinctly different ways: double-pulsing and fast-feed-
back loop instability.
Double-pulsing occurs due to noise on the output or
because the ESR is so low that there isnt enough volt-
age ramp in the output voltage signal. This fools the
error comparator into triggering a new cycle immedi-
ately after the 500ns minimum off-time period has
expired. Double-pulsing is more annoying than harmful,
resulting in nothing worse than increased output ripple.
However, it can indicate the possible presence of loop
instability, which is caused by insufficient ESR. Loop
instability can result in oscillations at the output after
line or load perturbations that can cause the output
voltage to go outside the tolerance limit.
The easiest method for checking stability is to apply a
very fast zero-to-max load transient (refer to the
MAX1761 EV kit manual) and carefully observe the out-
put voltage ripple envelope for overshoot and ringing. It
can help to simultaneously monitor the inductor current
with an AC current probe. Dont allow more than one
cycle of ringing after the initial step-response under- or
overshoot.
Input Capacitor Selection
The input capacitor must meet the ripple current
requirement (I
RMS
) imposed by the switching currents.
Nontantalum chemistries (ceramic, aluminum, or OS-
CON) are preferred due to their resilience to power-up
surge currents.
Power MOSFET Selection
DC bias and output power considerations dominate the
selection of the power MOSFETs used with the
MAX1761. Care should be taken not to exceed the
devices maximum voltage ratings. In general, both
switches are exposed to the supply voltage, so select
MOSFETs with V
DS(MAX)
greater than V+(max). Gate
drive to the N-channel and P-channel MOSFETs is not
symmetrical. The N-channel device is driven from
ground to the logic supply VL. The P-channel device is
driven from V+ to ground. The maximum rating for V
GS
for the N-channel device is usually not an issue.
However, V
GS(MAX)
for the P-channel must be at least
V+(max). Since V
GS(MAX)
is usually lower than
V
DS(MAX)
, gate-drive constraints often dictate the
required P-channel breakdown rating.
For moderate input-to-output differentials, the high-side
MOSFET (Q1) can be sized smaller than the low-side
MOSFET (Q2) without compromising efficiency. The
high-side switch operates at a very low duty cycle
under these conditions, so most conduction losses
occur in Q2. For maximum efficiency, choose a high-
side MOSFET (Q1) that has conduction losses (I
2
RD)
equal to the switching losses (fCV+
2
). Make sure that
the conduction losses at the minimum input voltage
dont exceed the package thermal limits or violate the
overall thermal budget. Similarly check for rating viola-
tions for conduction and switching losses at the maxi-
mum input voltage (see MOSFET Power Dissipation).
The MAX1761 has an adaptive dead-time circuitry that
prevents the high-side and low-side MOSFETs from
conducting at the same time (see MOSFET Gate
Drivers). Even with this protection, it is still possible for
delays internal to the MOSFET to prevent one MOSFET
from turning off when the other is turned on. The maxi-
mum mismatch time that can be tolerated is 60ns.
Select devices that have low turn-off times, and make
sure that NFET(t
DOFF(MAX)
) - PFET(t
DON(MIN)
) < 60ns,
and PFET(t
DOFF(MAX)
) - NFET(t
DON(MIN)
) < 60ns.
Failure to do so may result in efficiency-killing shoot-
through currents.
MOSFET selection also affects PC board layout. There
are four possible combinations of MOSFETs that can
be used with this switcher. The designs include:
Two dual complementary MOSFETs (Figure 7)
I
V(V-V)
RMS LOAD
OUT OUT
=
+
+
I
V
ƒ=
××
ESR
ESR F
1
2π RC
MAX1761
Small, Dual, High-Efficiency
Buck Controller for Notebooks
18 ______________________________________________________________________________________
A dual N-channel and a dual P-channel MOSFET
(Figure 8)
Two single N-channels and a dual P-channel
(Figure 9)
Two single N-channels and two single P-channels
(Figure 10)
There are trade-offs to each approach. Complementary
devices have appropriately scaled N- and P-channel
R
DS(ON)
and matched turn-on/turn-off characteristics.
However, there are relatively few manufacturers of
these specialized devices. Selection may be limited.
Dual N- and P-channel MOSFETs are more widely
available. As such, more efficient designs that benefit
from the large low-side MOSFETs can be realized. This
approach is most useful when the output power
requirements for both regulators are about the same.
This limitation can be sidestepped by using a dual P-
channel and two single N-channels. Using four single
MOSFETs gives the greatest design flexibility but will
require the most board area.
MOSFET Power Dissipation
Worst-case conduction losses occur at the duty factor
extremes. For the high-side MOSFET, the worst-case
power dissipation (P
D
) due to resistance occurs at the
minimum battery voltage:
Generally, a small high-side MOSFET is desired to
reduce switching losses at high input voltages.
However, the R
DS(ON)
required to stay within package
power-dissipation limits often limits how small the MOS-
FET can be. The optimum occurs when the switching
(AC) losses equal the conduction (R
DS(ON)
) losses.
High-side switching losses dont usually become an
issue until the input is greater than approximately 15V.
Switching losses in the high-side MOSFET can become
an insidious heat problem when maximum AC adapter
voltages are applied, due to the squared term in the
CV
2
F switching-loss equation. If the high-side MOSFET
youve chosen for adequate R
DS(ON)
at low battery volt-
ages becomes extraordinarily hot when subjected to
V+
(MAX)
, reconsider your MOSFET choice.
Calculating the power dissipation in Q1 due to switch-
ing losses is difficult since it must allow for difficult
quantifying factors that influence the turn-on and turn-
off times. These factors include the internal gate resis-
tance, gate charge, threshold voltage, source
inductance, and PC board layout characteristics. The
following switching-loss calculation provides only a
very rough estimate and is no substitute for breadboard
evaluation, preferably including a verification using a
thermocouple mounted on Q1:
where C
RSS
is the reverse transfer capacitance of Q1,
and I
GATE
is the peak gate-drive source/sink current
(1A typ).
For the low-side MOSFET (Q2) the worst-case power
dissipation always occurs at maximum battery voltage:
The absolute worst case for MOSFET power dissipation
occurs under heavy overloads that are greater than
I
LOAD (MAX)
but are not quite high enough to exceed the
current limit and cause the fault latch to trip. To protect
against this possibility, the circuit must be overdesigned
to tolerate:
I
LOAD
= I
LIMIT (MAX)
+ 1/2
LIR
I
LOAD (MAX)
P (Q2)
V
V+
IRs
D
OUT
(MAX)
OAD
2
=−
××1
L
P (Q1 switching)
CV+ I
I
D
RSS (MAX) LOAD
GATE
2
=
×׃×
P (Q1 resistance)
V
V+
IR
D
OUT
(MIN)
OAD
2
DS(ON)
=
××
L
P-CHANNEL
LX1
DH1
V+
DL1
DG
DS
DG
DS
N-CHANNEL
1
P-CHANNEL
LX2
DH2
V+
DL2
DG
DS
DG
DS
N-CHANNEL
1
Figure 7. Dual Complementary MOSFET Design

MAX1761EEE-T

Mfr. #:
Manufacturer:
Maxim Integrated
Description:
Switching Controllers
Lifecycle:
New from this manufacturer.
Delivery:
DHL FedEx Ups TNT EMS
Payment:
T/T Paypal Visa MoneyGram Western Union

Products related to this Datasheet