MAX8792
Single Quick-PWM Step-Down
Controller with Dynamic REFIN
22 ______________________________________________________________________________________
With most chemistries (polymer, tantalum, aluminum
electrolytic), the actual capacitance value required
relates to the physical size needed to achieve low ESR
and the chemistry limits of the selected capacitor tech-
nology. Ceramic capacitors provide low ESR, but the
capacitance and voltage rating (after derating) are
determined by the capacity needed to prevent V
SAG
and V
SOAR
from causing problems during load tran-
sients. Generally, once enough capacitance is added
to meet the overshoot requirement, undershoot at the
rising load edge is no longer a problem (see the V
SAG
and V
SOAR
equations in the
Transient Response
sec-
tion). Thus, the output capacitor selection requires
carefully balancing capacitor chemistry limitations
(capacitance vs. ESR vs. voltage rating) and cost.
Output Capacitor Stability Considerations
For Quick-PWM controllers, stability is determined by
the in-phase feedback ripple relative to the switching
frequency, which is typically dominated by the output
ESR. The boundary of instability is given by the following
equation:
where C
OUT
is the total output capacitance, R
ESR
is the
total equivalent-series resistance of the output capaci-
tors, R
PCB
is the parasitic board resistance between
the output capacitors and feedback sense point, and
R
COMP
is the effective resistance of the DC- or AC-cou-
pled current-sense compensation (see Figure 10).
For a standard 300kHz application, the effective zero
frequency must be well below 95kHz, preferably below
50kHz. With these frequency requirements, standard
tantalum and polymer capacitors already commonly
used have typical ESR zero frequencies below 50kHz,
allowing the stability requirements to be achieved with-
out any additional current-sense compensation. In the
standard application circuit (Figure 1), the ESR needed
to support a 15mV
P-P
ripple is 15mV/(10A x 0.3) =
5mΩ. Two 330μF, 9mΩ polymer capacitors in parallel
provide 4.5mΩ (max) ESR and 1/(2π x 330μF x 9mΩ) =
53kHz ESR zero frequency.
f
RC
RRR R
SW
EFF OUT
EFF ESR PCB COMP
ππ
=++
1
2
C
IN
L1
C
OUT
PWR
PWR
PWR
PWR
BST
LX
TON
DH
DL
FB
GND
AGND
2f
SW
R
ESR
C
OUT
1
STABILITY REQUIREMENT
MAX8792
OUTPUT
INPUT
Figure 8. Standard Application with Output Polymer or Tantalum
PCB PARASITIC RESISTANCE
SENSE RESISTANCE FOR EVALUATION
OUTPUT VOLTAGE REMOTELY
SENSED NEAR POINT OF LOAD
FEEDBACK RIPPLE IN PHASE WITH INDUCTOR CURRENT
C
IN
L1
C
OUT
PWR
PWR
PWR
R
COMP
100Ω
PWR
BST
LX
TON
DH
DL
FB
GND
AGND
2f
SW
R
ESR
C
OUT
1
f
SW
AND R
COMP
C
COMP
1
STABILITY REQUIREMENT
MAX8792
C
LOAD
PWR
OUTPUT
INPUT
Figure 9. Remote-Sense Compensation for Stability and Noise Immunity
MAX8792
Single Quick-PWM Step-Down
Controller with Dynamic REFIN
______________________________________________________________________________________ 23
Ceramic capacitors have a high ESR zero frequency,
but applications with sufficient current-sense compen-
sation may still take advantage of the small size, low
ESR, and high reliability of the ceramic chemistry. Using
the inductor DCR, applications using ceramic output
capacitors may be compensated using either a DC
compensation or AC compensation method (Figure 10).
The DC-coupling requires fewer external compensation
capacitors, but this also creates an output load line that
depends on the inductor’s DCR (parasitic resistance).
Alternatively, the current-sense information may be AC-
coupled, allowing stability to be dependent only on the
inductance value and compensation components and
eliminating the DC load line.
OPTION B: AC-COUPLED CURRENT-SENSE COMPENSATION
OPTION A: DC-COUPLED CURRENT-SENSE COMPENSATION
DC COMPENSATION
<> FEWER COMPENSATION COMPONENTS
<> CREATES OUTPUT LOAD LINE
<> LESS OUTPUT CAPACITANCE REQUIRED
FOR TRANSIENT RESPONSE
AC COMPENSATION
<> NOT DEPENDENT ON ACTUAL DCR VALUE
<> NO OUTPUT LOAD LINE
C
IN
L
C
OUT
R
SENA
R
SENB
C
SEN
PWR
PWR
PWR
PWR
BST
LX
TON
DH
DL
FB
GND
AGND
STABILITY REQUIREMENT
MAX8792
OUTPUT
INPUT
FEEDBACK RIPPLE IN-PHASE WITH INDUCTOR CURRENT
C
IN
L
C
OUT
R
SEN
R
COMP
C
COMP
C
SEN
PWR
PWR
PWR
PWR
BST
LX
TON
DH
DL
FB
GND
AGND
STABILITY REQUIREMENT
MAX8792
OUTPUT
INPUT
FEEDBACK RIPPLE IN PHASE WITH INDUCTOR CURRENT
Figure 10. Feedback Compensation for Ceramic Output Capacitors
L
RRC
C
f
AND LOAD LINE
RR
RR
SENA SENB SEN
OUT
SW
SENB DCR
SENA SENB
||
()
≥=
+
1
2
L
RC
C
f
AND R C
SEN SEN
OUT
SW
COMP COMP
≥=
1
2
3xxto xT
SW
5
MAX8792
Single Quick-PWM Step-Down
Controller with Dynamic REFIN
24 ______________________________________________________________________________________
When only using ceramic output capacitors, output
overshoot (V
SOAR
) typically determines the minimum
output capacitance requirement. Their relatively low
capacitance value may allow significant output over-
shoot when stepping from full-load to no-load condi-
tions, unless designed with a small inductance value
and high switching frequency to minimize the energy
transferred from the inductor to the capacitor during
load-step recovery.
Unstable operation manifests itself in two related but
distinctly different ways: double pulsing and feedback-
loop instability. Double pulsing occurs due to noise on
the output or because the ESR is so low that there is
not enough voltage ramp in the output voltage signal.
This “fools” the error comparator into triggering a new
cycle immediately after the minimum off-time period
has expired. Double pulsing is more annoying than
harmful, resulting in nothing worse than increased out-
put ripple. However, it can indicate the possible pres-
ence of loop instability due to insufficient ESR. Loop
instability can result in oscillations at the output after
line or load steps. Such perturbations are usually
damped, but can cause the output voltage to rise
above or fall below the tolerance limits.
The easiest method for checking stability is to apply a
very fast zero-to-max load transient and carefully
observe the output voltage-ripple envelope for over-
shoot and ringing. It can help to simultaneously monitor
the inductor current with an AC current probe. Do not
allow more than one cycle of ringing after the initial
step-response under/overshoot.
Input Capacitor Selection
The input capacitor must meet the ripple current
requirement (I
RMS
) imposed by the switching currents.
The I
RMS
requirements may be determined by the fol-
lowing equation:
The worst-case RMS current requirement occurs when
operating with V
IN
= 2V
OUT
. At this point, the above
equation simplifies to I
RMS
= 0.5 x I
LOAD
.
For most applications, nontantalum chemistries (ceramic,
aluminum, or OS-CON) are preferred due to their resis-
tance to inrush surge currents typical of systems with a
mechanical switch or connector in series with the input.
If the Quick-PWM controller is operated as the second
stage of a two-stage power-conversion system, tanta-
lum input capacitors are acceptable. In either configu-
ration, choose an input capacitor that exhibits less than
+10°C temperature rise at the RMS input current for
optimal circuit longevity.
Power-MOSFET Selection
Most of the following MOSFET guidelines focus on the
challenge of obtaining high load-current capability
when using high-voltage (> 20V) AC adapters. Low-
current applications usually require less attention.
The high-side MOSFET (N
H
) must be able to dissipate
the resistive losses plus the switching losses at both
V
IN(MIN)
and V
IN(MAX)
. Calculate both of these sums.
Ideally, the losses at V
IN(MIN)
should be roughly equal to
losses at V
IN(MAX)
, with lower losses in between. If the
losses at V
IN(MIN)
are significantly higher than the losses
at V
IN(MAX)
, consider increasing the size of N
H
(reducing
R
DS(ON)
but with higher C
GATE
). Conversely, if the losses
at V
IN(MAX)
are significantly higher than the losses at
V
IN(MIN)
, consider reducing the size of N
H
(increasing
R
DS(ON)
to lower C
GATE
). If V
IN
does not vary over a
wide range, the minimum power dissipation occurs
where the resistive losses equal the switching losses.
Choose a low-side MOSFET that has the lowest possible
on-resistance (R
DS(ON)
), comes in a moderate-sized
package (i.e., one or two 8-pin SOs, DPAK, or D
2
PAK),
and is reasonably priced. Make sure that the DL gate
driver can supply sufficient current to support the gate
charge and the current injected into the parasitic gate-
to-drain capacitor caused by the high-side MOSFET
turning on; otherwise, cross-conduction problems may
occur (see the
MOSFET Gate Drivers
section).
MOSFET Power Dissipation
Worst-case conduction losses occur at the duty factor
extremes. For the high-side MOSFET (N
H
), the worst-
case power dissipation due to resistance occurs at the
minimum input voltage:
Generally, a small high-side MOSFET is desired to
reduce switching losses at high-input voltages.
However, the R
DS(ON)
required to stay within package-
power dissipation often limits how small the MOSFET
can be. Again, the optimum occurs when the switching
losses equal the conduction (R
DS(ON)
) losses. High-
side switching losses do not usually become an issue
until the input is greater than approximately 15V.
Calculating the power dissipation in the high-side MOS-
FET (N
H
) due to switching losses is difficult since it must
allow for difficult quantifying factors that influence the
turn-on and turn-off times. These factors include the
internal gate resistance, gate charge, threshold voltage,
source inductance, and PCB layout characteristics. The
following switching-loss calculation provides only a very
PD N sistive
V
V
IR
H
OUT
IN
LOAD DS ON
( Re ) ( )
()
=
2
I
I
V
VVV
RMS
LOAD
IN
OUT IN OUT
=
()

MAX8792ETD+T

Mfr. #:
Manufacturer:
Maxim Integrated
Description:
Switching Controllers Single Quick-PWM Step-Down Controller
Lifecycle:
New from this manufacturer.
Delivery:
DHL FedEx Ups TNT EMS
Payment:
T/T Paypal Visa MoneyGram Western Union

Products related to this Datasheet